Read I-1068

Ballot Title
Statement of Subject: Initiative Measure No. 1068 concerns marijuana.

Concise Description: This measure would remove state civil and criminal penalties for persons eighteen years or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana. Restrictions and penalties for persons under eighteen would be retained.

Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes [ ] No [ ]

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would remove state civil and criminal penalties for persons eighteen years or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana. Marijuana would no longer be defined as a “controlled substance.” Civil and criminal penalties relating to drug paraphernalia and provisions authorizing seizure or forfeiture of property would not apply to marijuana-related offenses committed by persons eighteen years or older. The measure would retain current restrictions and penalties applicable to persons under eighteen.

Text of Initiative 1068.

An Act relating to the removal of civil and criminal penalties associated with adult marijuana use; amending RCW 9.94A.518, 69.50.101, 69.50.4014; adding a new section to RCW 9.94A; adding new sections to RCW 69.50; prescribing penalties; and providing an effective date.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION. Sec. 1.
Statement of Purpose.
(1) The People of the State of Washington are concerned about the millions of dollars spent each year to arrest, prosecute and incarcerate people for marijuana offenses. It is widely accepted that marijuana is a benign therapeutic substance that, unlike other legal substances such as tobacco and alcohol, has never caused a single death.
(2) In 1998, the People recognized the medicinal benefits of marijuana by approving and enacting Initiative 692, codified at RCW 69.51A, which authorized the medical use of marijuana by qualified patients. Since RCW 69.51A only provides an affirmative defense, it has proven ineffective at protecting qualified patients from arrest and prosecution.
(3) Several bills have been introduced in the legislature seeking decriminalization of marijuana, but none of the bills have been permitted to reach the floor of the legislature for a vote.
(4) Under current law:
(a) Washington citizens face the prospect of arrest, prosecution and incarceration, as well as the loss of employment and important parental and property rights, for marijuana offenses.
(b) Under current law, Washington farmers and landowners are prohibited from growing industrial hemp on their land, depriving them of the ability to grow a valuable, environmentally-friendly crop.
(5) The People intend to remove all existing civil and criminal penalties for adults eighteen years of age or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana, without impacting existing laws proscribing dangerous activities while under the influence of marijuana or certain conduct that exposes younger persons to marijuana.

Sec. 2. RCW 9.94A.518 and 2003 c 53 s 57 are each amended to read as follows:

TABLE 4 DRUG OFFENSES_INCLUDED WITHIN EACH SERIOUSNESS LEVEL III

Any felony offense under chapter 69.50 RCW with a deadly weapon special verdict under RCW 9.94A.602

Controlled Substance Homicide (RCW 69.50.415)

Delivery of imitation controlled substance by person eighteen
or over to person under eighteen (RCW 69.52.030(2))

Involving a minor in drug dealing (RCW 69.50.4015)

Manufacture of methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(2)(b))

Over 18 and deliver heroin, methamphetamine, a narcotic from Schedule I or II, or flunitrazepam from Schedule IV to someone under 18 (RCW 69.50.406)

Over 18 and deliver narcotic from Schedule III, IV, or V or a nonnarcotic, except flunitrazepam or methamphetamine, from Schedule I-V to someone under 18 and 3 years junior (RCW 69.50.406)

Possession of Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, or Anhydrous Ammonia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.440)

Selling for profit (controlled or counterfeit) any controlled substance (RCW 69.50.410)

II Create, deliver, or possess a counterfeit controlled substance (RCW 69.50.4011)

Deliver or possess with intent to deliver methamphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(2)(b))

Delivery of a material in lieu of a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.4012)

Maintaining a Dwelling or Place for Controlled Substances (RCW 69.50.402(1)(f))

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver amphetamine (RCW 69.50.401(2)(b))

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver narcotics from
Schedule I or II or flunitrazepam from Schedule IV (RCW 69.50.401(2)(a))

Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver narcotics from Schedule III, IV, or V or nonnarcotics from Schedule I-V (except marijuana, amphetamine, methamphetamines, or flunitrazepam) (RCW 69.50.401(2) (c) through (e))

Manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute an imitation controlled substance (RCW 69.52.030(1))

I Forged Prescription (RCW 69.41.020)

Forged Prescription for a Controlled Substance (RCW 69.50.403)

((Manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to deliver marijuana (RCW 69.50.401(2)(c))))

Possess Controlled Substance that is a Narcotic from Schedule III, IV, or V or Nonnarcotic from Schedule I-V (RCW 69.50.4013)

Possession of Controlled Substance that is either heroin or narcotics from Schedule I or II (RCW 69.50.4013)

Unlawful Use of Building for Drug Purposes (RCW 69.53.010)

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to Chapter 69.50 to read as follows:

Construction Clause.
Nothing in this act shall be construed to affect the provisions or penalties set forth in RCW 13.40, the juvenile justice act of 1977, or to legalize or authorize the possession, use, or manufacture of marijuana by persons under the age of eighteen.

Sec. 4. RCW 69.50.101 and 2003 c 142 s 57 are each amended to read as follows:

Definitions.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, definitions of terms shall be as indicated where used in this chapter:__ (a) “Administer” means to apply a controlled substance, whether by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means, directly to the body of a patient or research subject by:_ (1) a practitioner authorized to prescribe (or, by the practitioner’s authorized agent); or_ (2) the patient or research subject at the direction and in the presence of the practitioner._ (b) “Agent” means an authorized person who acts on behalf of or at the direction of a manufacturer, distributor, or dispenser. It does not include a common or contract carrier, public warehouseperson, or employee of the carrier or warehouseperson._ (c) “Board” means the state board of pharmacy._ (d) “Controlled substance” means a drug, substance, or immediate precursor included in Schedules I through V as set forth in federal or state laws, or federal or board rules. “Controlled substance” does not include marijuana._ (e)(1) “Controlled substance analog” means a substance the chemical structure of which is substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II and:_ (i) that has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system substantially similar to the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a controlled substance included in Schedule I or II; or_ (ii) with respect to a particular individual, that the individual represents or intends to have a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system substantially similar to the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a controlled substance included in Schedule I or II._ (2) The term does not include:_ (i) a controlled substance;_ (ii) a substance for which there is an approved new drug application;_ (iii) a substance with respect to which an exemption is in effect for investigational use by a particular person under Section 505 of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 355, to the extent conduct with respect to the substance is pursuant to the exemption; or_ (iv) any substance to the extent not intended for human consumption before an exemption takes effect with respect to the substance;
(f) “Deliver” or “delivery,” means the actual or constructive transfer from one person to another of a substance, whether or not there is an agency relationship._ (g) “Department” means the department of health._ (h) “Dispense” means the interpretation of a prescription or order for a controlled substance and, pursuant to that prescription or order, the proper selection, measuring, compounding, labeling, or packaging necessary to prepare that prescription or order for delivery._ (i) “Dispenser” means a practitioner who dispenses._ (j) “Distribute” means to deliver other than by administering or dispensing a controlled substance._ (k) “Distributor” means a person who distributes._ (l) “Drug” means (1) a controlled substance recognized as a drug in the official United States pharmacopoeia/national formulary or the official homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, or any supplement to them; (2) controlled substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in individuals or animals; (3) controlled substances (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of individuals or animals; and (4) controlled substances intended for use as a component of any article specified in (1), (2), or (3) of this subsection. The term does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories._ (m) “Drug enforcement administration” means the drug enforcement administration in the United States Department of Justice, or its successor agency._ (n) “Immediate precursor” means a substance:_ (1) that the state board of pharmacy has found to be and by rule designates as being the principal compound commonly used, or produced primarily for use, in the manufacture of a controlled substance;_ (2) that is an immediate chemical intermediary used or likely to be used in the manufacture of a controlled substance; and_ (3) the control of which is necessary to prevent, curtail, or limit the manufacture of the controlled substance._ (o) “Isomer” means an optical isomer, but in RCW 69.50.101(r)(5), 69.50.204(a) (12) and (34), and 69.50.206(a)(4), the term includes any geometrical isomer; in RCW 69.50.204(a) (8) and (42), and 69.50.210(c) the term includes any positional isomer; and in RCW 69.50.204(a)(35), 69.50.204(c), and 69.50.208 (a) the term includes any positional or geometric isomer._ (p) “Manufacture” means the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, conversion, or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly or by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis, and includes any packaging or repackaging of the substance or labeling or relabeling of its container. The term does not include the preparation, compounding, packaging, repackaging, labeling, or relabeling of a controlled substance:_ (1) by a practitioner as an incident to the practitioner’s administering or dispensing of a controlled substance in the course of the practitioner’s professional practice; or_ (2) by a practitioner, or by the practitioner’s authorized agent under the practitioner’s supervision, for the purpose of, or as an incident to, research, teaching, or chemical analysis and not for sale._ (q) “Marijuana” or “marihuana” means all parts of the plant Cannabis, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin. The term does not include the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of the plant which is incapable of germination._ (r) “Narcotic drug” means any of the following, whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis:_ (1) Opium, opium derivative, and any derivative of opium or opium derivative, including their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers, whenever the existence of the salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation. The term does not include the isoquinoline alkaloids of opium._ (2) Synthetic opiate and any derivative of synthetic opiate, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, whenever the existence of the isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is possible within the specific chemical designation._ (3) Poppy straw and concentrate of poppy straw._ (4) Coca leaves, except coca leaves and extracts of coca leaves from which cocaine, ecgonine, and derivatives or ecgonine or their salts have been removed._ (5) Cocaine, or any salt, isomer, or salt of isomer thereof._ (6) Cocaine base._ (7) Ecgonine, or any derivative, salt, isomer, or salt of isomer thereof._ (8) Any compound, mixture, or preparation containing any quantity of any substance referred to in subparagraphs (1) through (7)._ (s) “Opiate” means any substance having an addiction-forming or addiction-sustaining liability similar to morphine or being capable of conversion into a drug having addiction-forming or addiction-sustaining liability. The term includes opium, substances derived from opium (opium derivatives), and synthetic opiates. The term does not include, unless specifically designated as controlled under RCW 69.50.201, the dextrorotatory isomer of 3-methoxy-n-methylmorphinan and its salts (dextromethorphan). The term includes the racemic and levorotatory forms of dextromethorphan._ (t) “Opium poppy” means the plant of the species Papaver somniferum L., except its seeds._ (u) “Person” means individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision or agency, or any other legal or commercial entity._ (v) “Poppy straw” means all parts, except the seeds, of the opium poppy, after mowing._ (w) “Practitioner” means:_ (1) A physician under chapter 18.71 RCW, a physician assistant under chapter 18.71A RCW, an osteopathic physician and surgeon under chapter 18.57 RCW, an optometrist licensed under chapter 18.53 RCW who is certified by the optometry board under RCW 18.53.010 subject to any limitations in RCW 18.53.010, a dentist under chapter 18.32 RCW, a podiatric physician and surgeon under chapter 18.22 RCW, a veterinarian under chapter 18.92 RCW, a registered nurse, advanced registered nurse practitioner, or licensed practical nurse under chapter 18.79 RCW, a pharmacist under chapter 18.64 RCW or a scientific investigator under this chapter, licensed, registered or otherwise permitted insofar as is consistent with those licensing laws to distribute, dispense, conduct research with respect to or administer a controlled substance in the course of their professional practice or research in this state._ (2) A pharmacy, hospital or other institution licensed, registered, or otherwise permitted to distribute, dispense, conduct research with respect to or to administer a controlled substance in the course of professional practice or research in this state._ (3) A physician licensed to practice medicine and surgery, a physician licensed to practice osteopathic medicine and surgery, a dentist licensed to practice dentistry, a podiatric physician and surgeon licensed to practice podiatric medicine and surgery, or a veterinarian licensed to practice veterinary medicine in any state of the United States._ (x) “Prescription” means an order for controlled substances issued by a practitioner duly authorized by law or rule in the state of Washington to prescribe controlled substances within the scope of his or her professional practice for a legitimate medical purpose._ (y)
“Production” includes the manufacturing, planting, cultivating, growing, or harvesting of a controlled substance._ (z) “Secretary” means the secretary of health or the secretary’s designee._ (aa) “State,” unless the context otherwise requires, means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States._ (bb) “Ultimate user” means an individual who lawfully possesses a controlled substance for the individual’s own use or for the use of a member of the individual’s household or for administering to an animal owned by the individual or by a member of the individual’s household._ (cc) “Electronic communication of prescription information” means the communication of prescription information by computer, or the transmission of an exact visual image of a prescription by facsimile, or other electronic means for original prescription information or prescription refill information for a Schedule III-V controlled substance between an authorized practitioner and a pharmacy or the transfer of prescription information for a controlled substance from one pharmacy to another pharmacy.

Sec. 5. RCW 69.50.4014 and 2003 c 53 s 335 are each amended to read as follows:

Possession of forty grams or less.
Except as provided in RCW 69.50.401(2)(c), any person under eighteen years of age found guilty of possession of forty grams or less of ((marihuana)) marijuana is guilty of a misdemeanor.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 6.
A new section is added to chapter RCW 69.50 to read as follows:
The civil and criminal penalties relating to drug paraphernalia shall not apply to marijuana or marijuana-related offenses committed by persons eighteen years of age or older.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 7.
A new section is added to RCW 69.50 to read as follows:
No seizure or forfeiture of property may result from marijuana or marijuana-related offenses committed by persons eighteen years of age or older.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 8.
Severability.
If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 9.
Conflict of Laws.
In the event that any sections of this Act are in conflict with any other law codified in the Revised Code of Washington, the provisions of this Act shall control.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10.
Captions Not Laws.
Captions used in this chapter are not any part of the law.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11.
This act may be known and cited as the Marijuana Reform Act.

91 Comments to Read I-1068

  1. Aurora's Gravatar Aurora
    June 30, 2010 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    yes,, Legalize it!!

  2. June 30, 2010 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    I will support this bill. Why is it that we send people into bars, knowing the risk of losing a loved one, as soon as that person leaves the bar to go home, yet we can’t legalize marijuana? I have never heard of anyone who was under the influence of marijuana killing anyone including but not limited to, the entire family, yet we continue to say it’s OK to drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes that we know for a fact”will kill you or someone you know.” It makes no sense at all, yet we continue to condone it; who will die next?

  3. SpiffyCamel's Gravatar SpiffyCamel
    June 25, 2010 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    this is probally the best thing to ever happen to my state
    this NEEDS to happen

  4. June 25, 2010 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    I personally hate drugs, but I love Mary Jane. I am 15 years old. I have been through a lot in my short life, my mother recently abondoned me right before christmas and my birthday. I am currently in fostercare, because of my mothers addiction to REAL DRUGS such as crack, heroin and PCP. Ive always thought to myself, “Only if my mother would have stopped to take a toke of marijuana smoke, she would have thought to herself what am I doing, I cant leave my children and never come back”. But no, she didnt. I began smoking marijuana at the age of 13 to get away from my life, and I can honestly say marijuana saved my life:). Even if marijuana is still illegal to minors like me, it dosnt matter. This is about something much bigger than legalizing pot, its about putting an end to this terribly unjust violation of civil and human rights. Its time to tell the goverment to back off and let us live our lives, it is none of their buisness what we do on our own free time. I say a group of people gathering to smoke a harmless plant is nowhere near as dangerous as a group of people comming together to drink alcohol. My mother also was and still is a alcoholic, I have learned alcohol produces evil in people. When under the influence of alcohol users become physhicaly aggressive and beat people, while marijuana smokers become very hungry and eat your food and retire for an early night on the couch. Please push this bill not just for you but for the future. If I could sign it I would but I also am a convicted felon. I was arrested with 32.9 grahms of marijuana at 14 years old.

  5. reaganomics's Gravatar reaganomics
    June 22, 2010 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Such an incredibly stupid initiative.

  6. Philip Dawdy's Gravatar Philip Dawdy
    June 7, 2010 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    please press the where to sign tab above on our website

  7. Chris's Gravatar Chris
    June 7, 2010 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    I would be more than willing to sign this petition, but I cannot help get signatures, where can I sign it?

  8. Zachary's Gravatar Zachary
    June 7, 2010 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    I want to sign this petition but have not seen any signature takers yet. I also just read a story about how it might not make the ballot because the initiative is running out of money and can’t pay signature takers. Where can I find out about volunteering? Thanks in advance

  9. ralson kut's Gravatar ralson kut
    May 31, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Ok just a few questions so I’m not confused about anything because this is something I’ve been lokking into passionately. I smoke a lot and am now going to college for cannabis cultivation and research and would be very pleased to see this legalized! But I am wondering is this the actual full bill? Because there are very many things that seem to be left out that many people want to know… yes it will be legal for anyone over the age of 18. Now, how much can I have? How many plants can I grow? What would happen to the dealers that sell? I’m just ondering what this bill is all about… are they trying to decriminalize cannabis or legalizing it? If anyone could email me back that would be awesome

  10. May 18, 2010 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    you are doing the right thing i love it im from cali but moved to wa state trying to figure what to do have a physcians statement from cali good to jan 1,000 or more dispensaries no dispensaries in WA that sucks so how do i become legal only through my DR. or a licensed MD or something,,,help me please…keep pushing your doing a awesome thing.. peace love cures for the medicine its nature it grows wild in some states.

  11. May 18, 2010 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Good Idea. The best yet. However, knowing the powers that be, this section might get it shot down: “A new section is added to RCW 69.50 to read as follows:
    No seizure or forfeiture of property may result from marijuana or marijuana-related offenses”

    The good-ol-boy network won’t like that idea. I guarantee it. However, Give all we got. Fight Fight Fight!!!! I’m all for it!

  12. Philip Dawdy's Gravatar Philip Dawdy
    May 16, 2010 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    11×17 double sided black and white

  13. sebastian's Gravatar sebastian
    May 16, 2010 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    what size paper does this petition need to be printed on?

  14. Jack Means's Gravatar Jack Means
    May 7, 2010 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    It means that prior to posting, each comment is reviewed so that spam can be intercepted and deleted, keeping the site just a little cleaner.

  15. David Polen's Gravatar David Polen
    May 6, 2010 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    What does your comrnts are awaiting moderation mean??

  16. David Polen's Gravatar David Polen
    May 6, 2010 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    I am a 73 year old Korean War Veteran with a degree in Human Services and well over 20 years of experience in working with Adults with DD . I was convicted of manufacturing a controlled substance ( Marijuana) . Diagnosed with Sever Degenerative Bone Deasease, Marijuana relieved my symptoms with less debilitating side effects than any currently available prescription . The quantity I manufactured was small and clearly for my own use. While my doctor would not prescribe Medical Marijuana, (Concerned about Federal problems), He was kind enough to write a letter to the court advising, he believed ” Marijuana was a valid treatment for my condition”. The voters of WA State passed Legalization of Medical Marijuana. After several failed attempts to get certified as a legitimate user of Medical Marijuana, I took maters into my own hands. As a convicted Felon, I can no longer work with Adults with DD, youth and/or Senior citizens. I am not a criminal. I raised two sons to become productive U.S. citizens. I have been a productive U.S. citizen my entire life. Clearly, based upon my own experience, it is time to change this law. California is pointing the way, Let WA State join them in leading the way Nationally.

  17. Lee's Gravatar Lee
    April 26, 2010 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Where in SWWA can we find this petition in order to sign it? We have not seen anything down here.

  18. Nick's Gravatar Nick
    April 23, 2010 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    I am sorry to say that I can’t sign the petition because I am a legal resident of the state of Georgia, but I wish all of you the best of luck. I completely endorse the end to marijuana prohibition. Not only is it great for many ailments such as AIDS/HIV, cancer and the nauseating effects of chemotherapy, irritable bowel syndrome, Chron’s disease, insomnia, stress, and pain relief, but it’s just a great way to relax. Here’s a quick story for you guys. Proof to me that it is a great alternative for pain relief instead of pain medication. My late grandfather suffered all of his life with leg pain. He told me that there were nights that his mother had to rub his legs for him until he could fall to sleep. I thought to myself that a little bit of weed might help him. So, I got a bag to let him give it a try. He agreed and began to smoke. Shortly after he smoked he came to me and said “When I went outside my legs were hurting, but when I came back in the pain was gone.” I can only hope that this oppressive government will lift the stupid laws prohibiting marijuana. Good luck and God bless you all!

  19. April 19, 2010 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    keep at it, if you agree do your part if you disagree, do some more research and get your head straight.

  20. Philip Dawdy's Gravatar Philip Dawdy
    April 19, 2010 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    that does sound like a nice idea and one we might use down the road, but initiative campaigns generally don’t discuss hard numbers until they turn in their signatures to the sec or state.

  21. Ele's Gravatar Ele
    April 19, 2010 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    I would love to have a counter going on this website of how many signatures have been collected! and how many more we need? And then an update as soon as you can actually vote!

  22. April 18, 2010 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    I love the bill and it’s structure. It’s really concise and after getting past the legal jargon I saw a few things I liked.

    Though one really sticks out, and I’m afraid that it may be nitpicked, “Except as provided in RCW 69.50.401(2)(c), any person under eighteen years of age found guilty of possession of forty grams or less of ((marihuana)) marijuana is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

    Legislators might not approve of this line and it may hold up the process. We must not lose momentum.

  23. Mark's Gravatar Mark
    April 18, 2010 at 8:13 am | Permalink

    Signed the petition on the ferry yesterday. It’s about time.

  24. Michael's Gravatar Michael
    April 14, 2010 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    wait wait, nevermind. I didn’t see all the details. I’m going down to Quimper sound to sign tomorrow

  25. Michael's Gravatar Michael
    April 14, 2010 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Get this petition out on the peninsula!! There are tons of us out here willing to sign this.

  26. Philip Dawdy's Gravatar Philip Dawdy
    April 14, 2010 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    we cannot affect employment law with an initiative in this state or we would violate the single issue rule. all we can do is remove criminal penalties.

  27. Johnny C.'s Gravatar Johnny C.
    April 14, 2010 at 8:59 pm | Permalink

    So if marijuana is legalized, it would prohibit businesses and government agencies from drug testing their employees, right? What about people with a Commercial Driving License? As of now, people with a CDL in WA are but into a list for random drug screenings. Could a business reserve the right to hire “drug-free” employees?

  28. alex's Gravatar alex
    April 7, 2010 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    marijuana is a safe drug, for example, alcool is a very dangerous droug, it kills brain cells and it harms your liver,

    DONT DRINK, SMOKE!!!!

  29. ChronJohn's Gravatar ChronJohn
    April 5, 2010 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Oh ok I see now, my fault I mis-read, thought that it said “over 18″ for the 40 grams or less is a misdemeanor part, not “under 18″ and it confused me. That’s unfortunate that you cannot address any limits or regulatory apparatus anything else, it’d probably make it much easier to sell to the voters.. regardless, best of luck. I would help pound some pavement but I’m not from WA, just interested in what’s going on around the country. I’ll spread the word thru my network tho. Take care

  30. Staci's Gravatar Staci
    April 5, 2010 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    Two Questions:
    *Are there TV advertisements in the works? Educating voters is essential to getting this passed.
    *Are you prepared to keep fighting the good fight if it doesn’t pass? or will it simply be dropped like the Charter schools issue was?

  31. Philip Dawdy's Gravatar Philip Dawdy
    April 4, 2010 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    washington state has a strict single issue rule for initiatives so we could only remove criminal penalties. anything more such as time, place and manner rules would’ve gotten us into a court fight over a single issue violation. those regulations will be left to the state legislature after the people of this state legalize marijuana for adults.

  32. chronjohn's Gravatar chronjohn
    April 4, 2010 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    I see in the description it says “This measure would remove state civil and criminal penalties for persons eighteen years or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana.” however in the bill all I see is that possession of 40 grams or less is a misdemeanor, which is still a criminal penalty. So what exactly does this bill accomplish as far as “removing state civil and criminal penalties for persons 18 years or older who cultivate, possess, transport, sell, or use marijuana”? I’m not seeing any language to support any of that. No legal possession limit, no plant count, nothing about setting up a system of distribution.. am I missing something here??

  33. Amanda's Gravatar Amanda
    April 1, 2010 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    There is no good reason for this not to happen, but there sure are a lot of bad reasons that will get in the way just the same. Even though a large percentage of people in Washington use cannabis, some of them will not be in favor of this because they also profit off of it remaining illegal. If only those closed-minded anti-marijuana people would realize that they are helping the drug dealers by keeping weed illegal maybe they would switch sides out of spite. The social stigma against cannabis is ridiculous, but do enough people realize it to change? I truly, truly hope so, but I know it might take a while.
    Also, I’m unsure whether the federal government would respect these amendments or if federal enforcement would prosecute marijuana “crimes” in the state. I know there were problems with that in California with medical marijuana dispensaries from the movie “Super High Me” but I don’t really know much beyond that.

    I’m full of wishful thinking, but prepared for disappointment.

  34. March 29, 2010 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    If this passes, I’ll have to change my pants! This would save so many upstanding citizens from being labeled as criminals, and from having to pay heavy fines, as well as serving jail time. The only thing the police are doing by busting the people of WA State (along with the rest of this AMAZING country), is destroying lives.
    ************CAUSE THE WRAPSHEET YOU SAVE, COULD BE YOUR OWN************

  35. March 25, 2010 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Finally People Are Realizing the Good This Can Do :) I’m So In

  36. March 23, 2010 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    We have to get this passed! Please make every effort you can big or small to ending the insensible prohibition.

  37. Lionel Yarber's Gravatar Lionel Yarber
    March 22, 2010 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Please…. This should have been done in the 1970’s. And I’m quite sure, this so called “War on Drugs”, would have never existed

  38. IT-Guy's Gravatar IT-Guy
    March 15, 2010 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    5$ of marijuana has costed me thousand dollars and 2 days in jail (the pipes)

    Almost ruined my entire life with the threat of loosing school funds (current attending ITT for a 4 year bachelor degree)

    Being parted with my 1 year old son and branded a criminal was a horrible experience.

    Its about time

    WE WILL MAKE CHANGE For Sensible Washington

  39. will's Gravatar will
    March 14, 2010 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Id love to see this get passed. The same time California passes it. If only 2 states and not just one could do something this magnificent Id really be grateful and not have to worry about fear of jail time for smoking a plant.

  40. Heidi's Gravatar Heidi
    March 9, 2010 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    Another thing, has anyone thought about going door to door with these petitions? I know it may be hard to find people to do it but I’m sure there is some interest out there. And sure it might stir up a little controversy, but I think that is what that needs. To spread the word. Mormons do it, charities do it, magazine salesmen do it, as well as other petitioners, but why not us! The problem is people are ignorant to what pot really does to you. The war on drugs gave pot a very negative stereotype attached to it. Pot not only has ZERO recorded deaths, no conclusive evidence that pot is harmful to your health or causes cancer, but it has SO many medical benefits But soooo many people think it absolutely horrible because of the way it has been portrayed for so long. STOP THE LIES! LEGALIZE!

  41. Scott's Gravatar Scott
    March 7, 2010 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    One step closer to being able to emmulate my hero, Rick Simpson. Most of you probably know of him. If not, go ahead and google his name or “Run From The Cure”. He also has a website phoenixtears.ca. This man is CURING cancer amongst other life threatening deseases. Not just helping people live with their desease. Some pretty amazing stuff if you do a small amount of research. Imagine what this could do to healthcare! Exciting times! I’m glad to be a part of it!

  1. By on June 28, 2010 at 2:07 pm
  2. By on June 21, 2010 at 11:30 pm
  3. By on June 12, 2010 at 4:00 pm
  4. By on May 25, 2010 at 4:02 am
  5. By on April 15, 2010 at 1:41 am

Sensible Washington Fundraising Progress

Please visit our secure donation page and donate to Sensible Washington using Visa or MasterCard.